I think I reject both. Shrimp has ripple effects given the probability of many simulations and various other tail risks like spreading shrimp farming to space. And it's hard to believe that, say, giving to prevent 10,000 negative utility monsters from being tortured viciously for a dollar is lower impact than longtermism stuff.
I think I reject both. Shrimp has ripple effects given the probability of many simulations and various other tail risks like spreading shrimp farming to space. And it's hard to believe that, say, giving to prevent 10,000 negative utility monsters from being tortured viciously for a dollar is lower impact than longtermism stuff.
Shrimp welfare seems weird, but only because of bias and systematic ethical errors.
I think I reject both. Shrimp has ripple effects given the probability of many simulations and various other tail risks like spreading shrimp farming to space. And it's hard to believe that, say, giving to prevent 10,000 negative utility monsters from being tortured viciously for a dollar is lower impact than longtermism stuff.
Shrimp welfare seems weird, but only because of bias and systematic ethical errors.
I agree with your last sentence, I just think it applies equally to flimsy dismissals of longtermism!
Yeah plausible.