So it's partly just a judgment call about what's worth exploring further in light of those arguments.
I also think there's an especially interesting further question of what "real-world population ethics" looks like for one who accepts a more classically utilitarian stance on which additional good lives count as good -- especially in light of the fertility crisis, as more and more of the world's populations fall into "below replacement" patterns. There seems more to explore there that hasn't already been covered by our existing content.
Antinatalism tends to assume a strong procreative asymmetry, which we already discuss in our population ethics chapter:
https://www.utilitarianism.net/population-ethics/#person-affecting-views-and-the-procreative-asymmetry
So it's partly just a judgment call about what's worth exploring further in light of those arguments.
I also think there's an especially interesting further question of what "real-world population ethics" looks like for one who accepts a more classically utilitarian stance on which additional good lives count as good -- especially in light of the fertility crisis, as more and more of the world's populations fall into "below replacement" patterns. There seems more to explore there that hasn't already been covered by our existing content.