Might it be good to include something on the "exploitability" objection? This seems to be behind much of right-wing deontology's emphasis on vengeance/retribution.
Gustafsson's article "Bentham's Mugging" describes one aspect of this (linked below). But I assume it has been discussed a fair amount in philosophy of criminal law and ethics …
Might it be good to include something on the "exploitability" objection? This seems to be behind much of right-wing deontology's emphasis on vengeance/retribution.
Gustafsson's article "Bentham's Mugging" describes one aspect of this (linked below). But I assume it has been discussed a fair amount in philosophy of criminal law and ethics of war.
With the commitment abilities allowed by computers/AI, these things get more complex and people like Caspar Oesterheld are doing interesting work that may be relevant.
Might it be good to include something on the "exploitability" objection? This seems to be behind much of right-wing deontology's emphasis on vengeance/retribution.
Gustafsson's article "Bentham's Mugging" describes one aspect of this (linked below). But I assume it has been discussed a fair amount in philosophy of criminal law and ethics of war.
With the commitment abilities allowed by computers/AI, these things get more complex and people like Caspar Oesterheld are doing interesting work that may be relevant.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/9C67002F344B20661A6C35C960F25A86/S0953820822000218a.pdf/benthams_mugging.pdf