Ahh I see the confusion. I took the discussion to have the following form.
1) Utilitarian tradition is stunted.
2) My assumption (but maybe you disagree) the utilitarian tradition is a tradition of analyzing morality/ moral facts.
3) The utilitarian tradition can't be stunted if it doesn't include X facts unless X is moral anymore than it's stunted because it doesn't incorporate GR.
Ahh I see the confusion. I took the discussion to have the following form.
1) Utilitarian tradition is stunted.
2) My assumption (but maybe you disagree) the utilitarian tradition is a tradition of analyzing morality/ moral facts.
3) The utilitarian tradition can't be stunted if it doesn't include X facts unless X is moral anymore than it's stunted because it doesn't incorporate GR.
Ahh I see the confusion. I took the discussion to have the following form.
1) Utilitarian tradition is stunted.
2) My assumption (but maybe you disagree) the utilitarian tradition is a tradition of analyzing morality/ moral facts.
3) The utilitarian tradition can't be stunted if it doesn't include X facts unless X is moral anymore than it's stunted because it doesn't incorporate GR.