Calling something a mistake (“a myth”) assumes it’s settled and beyond doubt.
You ascertain a sort of epistemic weight to your own views and philosophy overall that simply doesn’t exist. That is the greatest mistake amongst all these alleged mistakes.
> "Calling something a mistake (“a myth”) assumes it’s settled and beyond doubt."
No it doesn't. You're foolishly assuming infallibilism about knowledge: I can know that P is mistaken, and correctly assert that P is mistaken, even if my justified true claim remains "open to doubt". This was the #1 "example of solved philosophy" mentioned in my decades-old post, and is universally recognized by philosophers today. Sounds like you could learn something from following those links!
[But banning you now, since you persist in being obnoxious while having nothing of value to add.]
> "Calling something a mistake (“a myth”) assumes it’s settled and beyond doubt."
No it doesn't. You're foolishly assuming infallibilism about knowledge: I can know that P is mistaken, and correctly assert that P is mistaken, even if my justified true claim remains "open to doubt". This was the #1 "example of solved philosophy" mentioned in my decades-old post, and is universally recognized by philosophers today. Sounds like you could learn something from following those links!
[But banning you now, since you persist in being obnoxious while having nothing of value to add.]