It might -- I don't find it immediately obvious either way. I'd mostly just clarify that it doesn't follow directly from the higher stakes, but more indirectly (if at all) based on whether those values make one more likely to be in a strangely "shaped" situation (reshaping the potential upsides and downsides of norm-breaking, not just uniformly raising the stakes across the whole distribution).
It might -- I don't find it immediately obvious either way. I'd mostly just clarify that it doesn't follow directly from the higher stakes, but more indirectly (if at all) based on whether those values make one more likely to be in a strangely "shaped" situation (reshaping the potential upsides and downsides of norm-breaking, not just uniformly raising the stakes across the whole distribution).
It might -- I don't find it immediately obvious either way. I'd mostly just clarify that it doesn't follow directly from the higher stakes, but more indirectly (if at all) based on whether those values make one more likely to be in a strangely "shaped" situation (reshaping the potential upsides and downsides of norm-breaking, not just uniformly raising the stakes across the whole distribution).