Sounds like a false dichotomy. You could also have option (iii): A set of priors that regards it as indeterminate whether value concordance or value discordance is more likely. (I defend this kind of perspective here: forum.effectivealtruism…)
Sounds like a false dichotomy. You could also have option (iii): A set of priors that regards it as indeterminate whether value concordance or value discordance is more likely. (I defend this kind of perspective here: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/NKx8sHcAyCiKT723b/should-you-go-with-your-best-guess-against-precise)
undefined subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)
Skip for now
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
Sounds like a false dichotomy. You could also have option (iii): A set of priors that regards it as indeterminate whether value concordance or value discordance is more likely. (I defend this kind of perspective here: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/NKx8sHcAyCiKT723b/should-you-go-with-your-best-guess-against-precise)