1 Comment
⭠ Return to thread

Altruists can always ask, "What can I do that would do the most good?" and it would be surprising if the answer (for someone of above-average wealth) was ever "spend 100% of my resources on personal consumption for myself."

But I wouldn't personally be terribly bothered by the fact that some people are *slightly* less well-off than I am, such that I could expect to do a couple of percentage points more good by reallocating my resources to them. I think the situation we're currently in, where others get *orders of magnitude* more benefit from marginal resources than I do, is much more troubling. And it's that massive gulf, and the associated "low hanging fruit" for *massively* improving the world, that I was suggesting should be fixable.

(Ultimately it's a spectrum rather than a binary, but current global inequality is so extreme that it's pretty clear we're not currently in the "grey zone" where the urgency of altruism could reasonably be questioned.)

Expand full comment