I definitely don't think the telic approach *by itself* entails consequentialism (I'm at pains in Part I to argue that it's compatible with the full range of moral theories). It's more that it enables the further arguments developed in the later parts of the book, which aim to show that consequentialism coheres much better with important moral intuitions than do rival views.
I definitely don't think the telic approach *by itself* entails consequentialism (I'm at pains in Part I to argue that it's compatible with the full range of moral theories). It's more that it enables the further arguments developed in the later parts of the book, which aim to show that consequentialism coheres much better with important moral intuitions than do rival views.
I definitely don't think the telic approach *by itself* entails consequentialism (I'm at pains in Part I to argue that it's compatible with the full range of moral theories). It's more that it enables the further arguments developed in the later parts of the book, which aim to show that consequentialism coheres much better with important moral intuitions than do rival views.